Test administration and other operations are a crucial part of the test development cycle, but often overlooked. Professional-grade exams such as certification or admissions are expensive to develop, so an organization wants to protect that investment by delivering the exam with appropriate security so that items are not stolen. Moreover, there is an obvious incentive for candidates to cheat. So, a test sponsor needs appropriate processes in place to administer the exams. Here are some tips.
1. Determine the best approach for test administration and proctoring
Here are a few of the considerations to take into account. These can be crossed with each other, such as delivering paper exams at Events vs. Test Centers.
Timing: Cohorts/Windows vs Continuous Availability
Do you have cohorts, where events make more sense, or do you need continuous? For example, if the test is tied to university training programs that graduate candidates in December and May each year, that affects your need for delivery. Alternatively, some exams are not tied to an academic calendar; you might have to only show work experience. In those cases, candidates are ready to take the test continuously throughout the year.
Mode: Paper vs Computer
Does it make more sense to deliver the test on paper or on computer? This used to be a cost issue, but now the cost of computerized delivery, especially with online proctoring at home, has dropped significantly while saving so much time for candidates. Also, some exam types like clinical simulations can only be delivered on computers.
Location: Test centers vs Online proctored vs Events vs Multi-Modal

Some types of tests require events, such as a clinical assessment in an actual clinic with standardized patients. Some tests can be taken anywhere. Some utilize networks of test centers. Exam events can also coincide with other events; perhaps you have online delivery through the year but deliver a paper version of the test at your annual conference, for convenience.
Do you have an easy way to make your own locations, if you are considering that? One example is that you have quarterly regional conferences for your profession, where you could simply get a side room to deliver your test to candidates since they will already be there. Another is that most of your candidates are coming from training programs at universities, and you are able to use classrooms at those universities.
Geography: State, National, or International
If your exam is for a small US state or a small country, it might be easy to require exams in a test center, because you can easily set up only one or two test centers to cover the geography. Some certifications are international, and need to deliver on-demand throughout the year; those are a great fit for online.
Security: Low vs High
If your test has extremely high stakes, there is extremely high incentive to cheat. An entry-level certification on WordPress is different than a medical licensure exam. The latter is a better fit for test centers, while the former might be fine with online proctoring on-demand.
Online proctoring: AI vs Recorded vs Live
If you choose to explore online proctoring, here are three main types to evaluate.

A. AI only: AI only proctoring means that there are no humans. The examinee is recorded on video, and AI algorithms flag potential issues. Examples include if they leave their seat, there are voices on the video, or two faces. The system then notifies an administrator (usually a professor) of students with a high number of flags. This approach is usually not relevant for certifications or other credentialing exams, it is more for low-stakes exams like a Psychology 101 Midterm at your local university.
B. Record and Review: Record and review proctoring means that the examinee is recorded on video, but that video is watched by a real human. The human flags the result if they think there is cheating, theft, or other issues. This is much higher quality, and higher price, but has one major flaw that might be concerning to certification tests: if someone steals your test by taking pictures, you won’t find out until tomorrow. But at least you know who it was and you are certain of what happened, with a video proof. Perhaps useful for microcredentials or recertification exams.
C. Live Online Proctoring: Live online proctoring (LOP), or what I call “live human proctoring” (because some AI proctoring is also “live” in real time!) means that there is a professional human proctor on the other side of the video from the examinee. They check the examinee in, confirm their identity, scan the room, provide instructions, and actually watch them take the test. Some providers like MonitorEDU even have the examinee make a second video stream on their phone, which is placed on a bookshelf or similar spot to see the entire room through the test. Certainly, this approach is a very good fit with certification exams and other credentialing. You protect the test content as well as the validity of that individual’s score; that is not possible with the other two approaches.
We have also prepared a list of the best online proctoring software platforms.
2. Determine other technology, psychometric, and operational needs
Next, your organization should establish any other needs for your exams that could impact the vendor selection.
- Do you require special item types, such that the delivery platform needs to support or integrate with them?
- Do you have simulations or OSCEs?
- Do you have specific needs around accessibility and accommodations for your candidates?
- Do you need adaptive testing or linear on the fly testing?
- Do you need extensive Psychometric consulting services?
- Do you need an integrated registration and payment portal? Or a certification management system to track expirations and other important information?
Write all these up so that you can use the list to shop for a provider.
3. Find a provider – or several!
While it might seem easier to find a single provider for everything, that’s often not the best solution. Look for those vendors that specifically fit your needs.
For example, most providers of remote proctoring are just that: remote proctoring. They do not have a professional platform to manage item banks, schedule examinees, deliver tests, create custom score reports, and analyze psychometrics. Some do not even integrate with such platforms, and only integrate with learning management systems like Moodle that is designed for a university not a certification test. So if you are seeking a vendor for certification testing or other credentialing, the list of potential vendors is smaller.
Likewise, there are some vendors that only do the exam development and psychometrics, but lack a software platform and proctoring services for deliver. In these cases, they might have very specific expertise, and often have lower costs due to lower overhead. An example is JML Testing Services.
Once you have some idea what you are looking for, start shopping for vendors that provide services for certification exam delivery, development, and scoring. In some cases, you might not settle on a certain approach right away, and that’s OK. See what is out there and compare prices. Perhaps the cost of Live Remote Proctoring is more affordable than you anticipated, and you can upgrade to that.
Besides a simple Google search some good places to start are the member listings of the Association of Test Publishers and the Institute for Credentialing Excellence.
4. Establish the new process with policies and documentation

Once you have finalized your vendors, you need to write policies and documentation around them. For example, if your vendor has a certain login page for proctoring (we have ascproctor.com), you should take relevant screenshots and write up a walkthrough so candidates know what to expect. Much of this should go into your Candidate Handbook. Some of the things to cover that are specific to exam day for the candidates:
- How to prepare for the exam
- How to take a practice test
- What is allowed during the exam
- What is not allowed
- ID needed and the check-in process
- Details on specific locations (if using locations)
- Rules for accessibility and accommodations
- Time limits and other practical considerations in the exam
Next, consider all the things that are impacted other than exam day.
- Eligibility pathways and applications
- Registration and scheduling
- Candidate training and practice tests
- Reporting: just to the candidates, or perhaps to training programs as well?
- Accounting and other operations: consider your business needs, such as how you manage money, monthly accounting reports, etc.
- Test security plan: What do you do if someone is caught taking pictures of the exam with their phone, or the other potential events?
5. Let Everyone Know
Once you have written up everything, make sure all the relevant stakeholders know. Publish the new Candidate Handbook and announce to the world. Send emails to all upcoming candidates with instructions and an opportunity for a practice exam. Put a link on your homepage. Get in touch with all the training programs or universities in your field. Make sure that everyone has ample opportunity to know about the new process!
6. Roll Out
Finally, of course, you can implement the new approach to test delivery. You might launch a new certification test from scratch, or perhaps you are moving one from paper to online with remote proctoring, or some other change. Either way, you need a date to start using it and a change management process. The good news is that, even though it’s probably a lot of work to get here, the new approach is probably going to save you time and money in the long run. Roll it out!
Also, remember that this is not a single point in time. You’ll need to update into the future. You should also consider the implementation of audits or quality control as a way to drive improvement.
Ready to start?
Test administration is a surprisingly complex and wide-ranging process. In addition, it’s surrounded by operational concerns, from registration windows to payment/eligibility processing to results release. The greater the scale and the stakes, the more potential threats and pitfalls. Contact us to talk to one of our expert psychometricians.

Nathan Thompson earned his PhD in Psychometrics from the University of Minnesota, with a focus on computerized adaptive testing. His undergraduate degree was from Luther College with a triple major of Mathematics, Psychology, and Latin. He is primarily interested in the use of AI and software automation to augment and replace the work done by psychometricians, which has provided extensive experience in software design and programming. Dr. Thompson has published over 100 journal articles and conference presentations, but his favorite remains https://scholarworks.umass.edu/pare/vol16/iss1/1/ .

