
Mihaela-Georgiana Balan
Mihaela-Georgiana Balan (b. 1987) is lecturer PhD at the National University of Arts „George Enescu” in Iași, having a broad teaching and musicological activity based on research, involvement in artistic projects, guidance and support for students. Being herself a graduate and PhD specialist in musicology at this institution, she dedicated her training years to the events organized within the academic space, participated in scientific symposiums, specialized competitions, and artistic events. She is currently teaching courses and seminars for the disciplines: Musical Forms and Analysis, History of Music, Musicology, and Applied Research.As a researcher, she is the author of the volume of musicological analysis entitled Language, Structure, Musical Semantics in the Piano Sonatas of Russian Composers from the first half of the 20th Century, published by Editura Muzicală, Bucharest, 2022, ISBN 978-973-42-1237-8, ISMN 979-0-69491-241-3.She has written musicological studies for various publications in Romanian and English, those of the last 10 years being visible in international databases, numerous articles of music criticism, reviews, reports for music magazines, and specialized websites in this field.
less
Related Authors
Diane Pecorari
University of Leeds
Judith L Green
University of California, Santa Barbara
Andreas Umland
National University of "Kyiv-Mohyla Academy"
Katherine Butler Schofield
King's College London
Ruben López-Cano
Escola Superior de Música de Catalunya
David Seamon
Kansas State University
Egil Bakka
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Armando Marques-Guedes
UNL - New University of Lisbon
Francisco J. [Paco] Bethencourt Llobet
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Tuomas Eerola
Durham University
InterestsView All (15)
Uploads
Papers by Mihaela-Georgiana Balan
„Frenesia” and „Mantrana” are two orchestral works (the first is for usual orchestra and the second is for chamber orchestra) composed in consecutive years (2000 and 2001); although closely created in time, these works have various features that awaken the interest to analyze the conceiving process, the aesthetical background, the connection between title, content and other aspects. The study focuses on each of the musical parameters (melody, rhythm, dynamics, agogics, orchestration, musical quotations concerning the musical references to other stylistic periods or areas), trying to investigate the technical as well as artistic “anatomy” of „Frenesia” and „Mantrana”.
most daring novelties of musical language among his contemporaries,
in the context of Russian composers’ generation from the first half of
the 20th century. In the piano field, he approached genres considered to be
typically to Chopin’s works (etudes, preludes, waltzes, mazurkas, nocturnes), but he has also composed ten sonatas, that reflect all stages of his artistic formation.
Since 1892, when he composed his first sonata, until 1913, when he
finished his eighth, ninth, and tenth sonatas, Scriabin has been keeping a consistent interest for this genre, bringing new ideas on the structural, harmonic, piano level and inserting pitch structures at the limit between tonal, atonal and modal. In this paper, I have approached two contrasting works (especially from the stylistic point of view), in order to emphasize Scriabin’s position at the boundary between tradition and innovation.
„Frenesia” and „Mantrana” are two orchestral works (the first is for usual orchestra and the second is for chamber orchestra) composed in consecutive years (2000 and 2001); although closely created in time, these works have various features that awaken the interest to analyze the conceiving process, the aesthetical background, the connection between title, content and other aspects. The study focuses on each of the musical parameters (melody, rhythm, dynamics, agogics, orchestration, musical quotations concerning the musical references to other stylistic periods or areas), trying to investigate the technical as well as artistic “anatomy” of „Frenesia” and „Mantrana”.
most daring novelties of musical language among his contemporaries,
in the context of Russian composers’ generation from the first half of
the 20th century. In the piano field, he approached genres considered to be
typically to Chopin’s works (etudes, preludes, waltzes, mazurkas, nocturnes), but he has also composed ten sonatas, that reflect all stages of his artistic formation.
Since 1892, when he composed his first sonata, until 1913, when he
finished his eighth, ninth, and tenth sonatas, Scriabin has been keeping a consistent interest for this genre, bringing new ideas on the structural, harmonic, piano level and inserting pitch structures at the limit between tonal, atonal and modal. In this paper, I have approached two contrasting works (especially from the stylistic point of view), in order to emphasize Scriabin’s position at the boundary between tradition and innovation.