Prehistoric people got into fights, some of them rather large in size and scale. They also carried out what appear, for lack of a better term, to be honor killings. They could take very good care of members of the community, and at the same time be brutal to outsiders.
It always surprises me a little when people are terribly upset by this. People are people. The basic hardware and deep-running software have not changed all that much in the past fifteen thousand years or so. Certain Native American groups have gone to great lengths to stop archaeologists from doing research that might show that their ancestors were at times violent people who may (or may not) have eaten parts of other people. Anyone who looks at a place like Hovenweep, or parts of Mesa Verde, or the Hopi mesa-top towns, or reads early European accounts of meeting Native Americans would not be surprised to learn that the ancient pueblos were easily defendable, or that warfare and raiding might have taken place. Ditto in Europe, although cliff dwellings are less common in most of Europe due to geology.
I was thinking about a video I watched about a genetic bottleneck in the male line of a certain population, and what it might signify. It appears that a lot of men were killed off at roughly the same time, leading to evidence of a bottleneck in the male chromosome contribution. A slightly related pattern has been observed in Scotland and Ireland, where Scandinavian genetic traces suddenly became more common in the male lines, reducing the native male contribution to varying degrees.
Prehistoric people were not peaceful. Who knew? [eyeroll or similar gesture here]. I’m neither surprised nor upset by this information, because people are people. But for some cultures and the mental picture they have of the Ancestors, this kind of information is very upsetting, and has to be explained away, or suppressed. Those who came before can’t have been violent killers who ate the losers. Absolutely not. To admit otherwise is to threaten the faith and perhaps even the foundation of community cohesion. Note that some of these same believers argue that to accept a different faith is to cast oneself out of the community for ever. Only pagans may be tribal members, because Reasons. Among the Hopi, ritual and faith keeps the universe in balance, and those who upset the balance must be counseled, or if extreme enough, removed permanently from doing what they are doing to cause trouble.
My ancestors killed other people, beat them up, stole their livestock, and did what was needed to survive. So did yours. That’s why I’m here, why you are here. That this distresses some moderns … I don’t get it. At an academic level I can comprehend the reasons, but I don’t “get” it.



