
George Zachos
Address: Academy of Athens
Research Center for Antiquity
14 Anagnostopoulou Str.
GR-10673
Greece
Research Center for Antiquity
14 Anagnostopoulou Str.
GR-10673
Greece
less
Related Authors
Kleanthis Zouboulakis
National & Kapodistrian University of Athens
Chrysanthos Kanellopoulos
National & Kapodistrian University of Athens
George Andreiomenos
University of the Peloponnese
Patricia Riak, BA (Hons), PhD, GradDipEd (Hons).
Montclair State University
Thanassis Karabatsos
Ionian University
Georgios Tsiakalos
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Christos Argryrou
Ministry of Education and Culture, Republic of Cyprus
InterestsView All (13)
Uploads
Papers by George Zachos
The insistence of the Press in the years 1897-1899 on the existence of Leonidas’s tomb and that of the 300, which was cauterized by K. Palamas, should be related to the need for revitalization of people’s morale during the war of 1897 and afterwards, as well as to the restoration of both the harmed image of the Successor and the Great Idea (Megali Idea). A connection can also be traced to the presence of the historian G. Kremos as a high school principal in Lamia at the time of the events.
ένας σπαρτιάτης βασιλιάς θυσιάστηκε για την Ελλάδα (αφού θυσίασε στους θεούς), έτσι ένας διάκος από την Δωρίδα θυσιάστηκε (αφού προσευχήθηκε) για «την πίστη την αγία και της πατρίδος την ελευθερία», αμυνόμενοι και οι δύο σε ένα στενό που σχεδόν κανείς δεν εμπόδισε κανέναν (από τους Πέρσες μέχρι την Βέρμαχτ) να το διαβεί, κάτω από το βλέμμα του γενάρχη των Δωριέων (Ηρακλής) που έγινε ολοκαύτωμα στη κορυφή του διπλανού βουνού. Η συσχέτιση του Διάκου με τον Λεωνίδα δεν πραγματοποιείται σε επίπεδο μορφών, αλλά σε επίπεδο συμβολισμών. Το ίδιο εξ άλλου επίπεδο επέλεξε και το ελληνικό κράτος επιλέγοντας να συνεορτάσει τα 200 χρόνια από την έναρξη της Επανάστασης με τα 2500 χρόνια από τις Θερμοπύλες, την Σαλαμίνα και τις Πλαταιές και όχι με την Μάχη του Μαραθώνα.
Η σύνδεση των δύο μορφών, μπορεί να φαίνεται προφανής λόγω της τοπογραφικής εγγύτητας των μαχών και του προδιαγεγραμμένου τέλους που σύμφωνα με την παράδοση επέλεξαν οι πρωταγωνιστές τους. Ωστόσο υποκρύπτουν συμβολικά φορτία που στην μεν μορφή του Λεωνίδα επικάθησαν από τον Μεσαίωνα μέχρι τον Διαφωτισμό στη Δύση, στη δε μορφή του Διάκου στις τρεις τελευταίες δεκαετίες του 19ου αι. και μέχρι τα πρώτα μεταεμφυλιακά χρόνια στον ελλαδικό χώρο. Στο τελευταίο αυτό διάστημα, οι δύο αυτές μορφές, ως σύμβολα πλέον, πολλές φορές συναντήθηκαν και ανανοηματοδοτήθηκαν.
engineer Hector Abel Gotteland who had undertaken the delineation of the railway line from Athens to Thessaly visited the sanctuary of Athena Kranaia and shared his impressions with his friend Pierre Paris,
a young promising member of the French School at Athens, who asked the permission of the Ministry to investigate the sanctuary. The excavation started under bad weather conditions in November 1883 and was
supervised on behalf of the Greek Archaeological Service initially by Panagiotis Stamatakis and later by Epameinondas Koromantzos. Their reports offer plenty of evidence about the excavations in the sanctuary
and later in the city, as well as about the fate of the finds, finally identified almost a century later at the National Museum and at Chaeronea museum. Equally valuable is the information about Drachmani in 19th
century and its inhabitants.
The archaeological surveys in the northern and south-eastern parts of the island identified a large number of rural sites on 1/3 of which beehive sherds were found. This material is a good opportunity: i) to re-consider the legend of Aristaeus, ii) to draw conclusions about the use of these vessels according to the information provided by the ancient literature (Pseudo-Aristotle, Pliny the Elder, Varro, Columella), and iii) to emphasize the importance of beekeeping for the island's economy, particularly in the 4th century and the beginning of the 3rd century BC, when the production of honey (as well as wax) appears to have been a kind of Keian trademark.
were converted into gazetteers. Maps gradually became a mere supplement to this index. More recently, with the aid of GIS mapping and databases, maps have regained importance.
The Academy of Athens has participated in the TIR project since 1972. The first volume (Philippi) was published in 1993. Over the last decade, an intense effort has been made to publish volumes devoted to the
entire area of Greece. Six new volumes are now available, covering the area from Epirus and Thessaly to Attica and the Aegean Islands.
The TIR-Greece research group is currently exploring new ways of presenting and analysing archaeological, historical and spatial data. The first example of this process covers western Greece (Aitolia-Akarnania and Epirus). In this paper, we present changes in settlement patterns in western Greece after the Roman conquest and we attempt to address historical issues, such as the impact of the Roman presence on the area.
This essay sets out the details that make up the image of Opous in the Roman period (viz. the topography of the city, its pottery production, numismatic issues, sculpture, and the existence of an elite class, of Roman resident aliens and private associations), in parallel with the changes in the settlement pattern from the Late Hellenistic to the Late Roman period.
These changes took place in two phases: a) at the end of the 2nd cent. B.C. and into the next, when Opous flourished - coupled perhaps with the events of the First Mithridatic war, which led to a decline for the smaller settlements in the region, and b) during the Late Roman period, when a series of sites with rural and storage functions appear on the seacoast at Livanates, Scala Atalantis and at Kyparissi - a development that should be associated with the emergence of Skarpheia as the headquarters of the "praepositus horreorum" for the entire region from the Gulf of Euboea to Aetolia.
They were found in the fields in the area of modern Elateia, Panagitsa, Modi, Tithorea and Aghia Marina settlements. They are mainly of the palmette and pedimental type or simply raw stones. One is of the Boeotian beam-like type and another has been reworked on the occasion of a secondary use, so that a triangular tip is created. Finally, one stele bears a relief decoration. The pieces are dated from the 6th to the 2nd century BC, and the style of the first two categories indicates the existence of local or regional workshops. The inscribed names are
common in Phocis, Boeotia and Lokris, while some rare or even unknown ones enrich the record of the ancient cities they belonged to (Elateia, Triteis or Pedieis, Tithorea, Ledon or Patronis).
The insistence of the Press in the years 1897-1899 on the existence of Leonidas’s tomb and that of the 300, which was cauterized by K. Palamas, should be related to the need for revitalization of people’s morale during the war of 1897 and afterwards, as well as to the restoration of both the harmed image of the Successor and the Great Idea (Megali Idea). A connection can also be traced to the presence of the historian G. Kremos as a high school principal in Lamia at the time of the events.
ένας σπαρτιάτης βασιλιάς θυσιάστηκε για την Ελλάδα (αφού θυσίασε στους θεούς), έτσι ένας διάκος από την Δωρίδα θυσιάστηκε (αφού προσευχήθηκε) για «την πίστη την αγία και της πατρίδος την ελευθερία», αμυνόμενοι και οι δύο σε ένα στενό που σχεδόν κανείς δεν εμπόδισε κανέναν (από τους Πέρσες μέχρι την Βέρμαχτ) να το διαβεί, κάτω από το βλέμμα του γενάρχη των Δωριέων (Ηρακλής) που έγινε ολοκαύτωμα στη κορυφή του διπλανού βουνού. Η συσχέτιση του Διάκου με τον Λεωνίδα δεν πραγματοποιείται σε επίπεδο μορφών, αλλά σε επίπεδο συμβολισμών. Το ίδιο εξ άλλου επίπεδο επέλεξε και το ελληνικό κράτος επιλέγοντας να συνεορτάσει τα 200 χρόνια από την έναρξη της Επανάστασης με τα 2500 χρόνια από τις Θερμοπύλες, την Σαλαμίνα και τις Πλαταιές και όχι με την Μάχη του Μαραθώνα.
Η σύνδεση των δύο μορφών, μπορεί να φαίνεται προφανής λόγω της τοπογραφικής εγγύτητας των μαχών και του προδιαγεγραμμένου τέλους που σύμφωνα με την παράδοση επέλεξαν οι πρωταγωνιστές τους. Ωστόσο υποκρύπτουν συμβολικά φορτία που στην μεν μορφή του Λεωνίδα επικάθησαν από τον Μεσαίωνα μέχρι τον Διαφωτισμό στη Δύση, στη δε μορφή του Διάκου στις τρεις τελευταίες δεκαετίες του 19ου αι. και μέχρι τα πρώτα μεταεμφυλιακά χρόνια στον ελλαδικό χώρο. Στο τελευταίο αυτό διάστημα, οι δύο αυτές μορφές, ως σύμβολα πλέον, πολλές φορές συναντήθηκαν και ανανοηματοδοτήθηκαν.
engineer Hector Abel Gotteland who had undertaken the delineation of the railway line from Athens to Thessaly visited the sanctuary of Athena Kranaia and shared his impressions with his friend Pierre Paris,
a young promising member of the French School at Athens, who asked the permission of the Ministry to investigate the sanctuary. The excavation started under bad weather conditions in November 1883 and was
supervised on behalf of the Greek Archaeological Service initially by Panagiotis Stamatakis and later by Epameinondas Koromantzos. Their reports offer plenty of evidence about the excavations in the sanctuary
and later in the city, as well as about the fate of the finds, finally identified almost a century later at the National Museum and at Chaeronea museum. Equally valuable is the information about Drachmani in 19th
century and its inhabitants.
The archaeological surveys in the northern and south-eastern parts of the island identified a large number of rural sites on 1/3 of which beehive sherds were found. This material is a good opportunity: i) to re-consider the legend of Aristaeus, ii) to draw conclusions about the use of these vessels according to the information provided by the ancient literature (Pseudo-Aristotle, Pliny the Elder, Varro, Columella), and iii) to emphasize the importance of beekeeping for the island's economy, particularly in the 4th century and the beginning of the 3rd century BC, when the production of honey (as well as wax) appears to have been a kind of Keian trademark.
were converted into gazetteers. Maps gradually became a mere supplement to this index. More recently, with the aid of GIS mapping and databases, maps have regained importance.
The Academy of Athens has participated in the TIR project since 1972. The first volume (Philippi) was published in 1993. Over the last decade, an intense effort has been made to publish volumes devoted to the
entire area of Greece. Six new volumes are now available, covering the area from Epirus and Thessaly to Attica and the Aegean Islands.
The TIR-Greece research group is currently exploring new ways of presenting and analysing archaeological, historical and spatial data. The first example of this process covers western Greece (Aitolia-Akarnania and Epirus). In this paper, we present changes in settlement patterns in western Greece after the Roman conquest and we attempt to address historical issues, such as the impact of the Roman presence on the area.
This essay sets out the details that make up the image of Opous in the Roman period (viz. the topography of the city, its pottery production, numismatic issues, sculpture, and the existence of an elite class, of Roman resident aliens and private associations), in parallel with the changes in the settlement pattern from the Late Hellenistic to the Late Roman period.
These changes took place in two phases: a) at the end of the 2nd cent. B.C. and into the next, when Opous flourished - coupled perhaps with the events of the First Mithridatic war, which led to a decline for the smaller settlements in the region, and b) during the Late Roman period, when a series of sites with rural and storage functions appear on the seacoast at Livanates, Scala Atalantis and at Kyparissi - a development that should be associated with the emergence of Skarpheia as the headquarters of the "praepositus horreorum" for the entire region from the Gulf of Euboea to Aetolia.
They were found in the fields in the area of modern Elateia, Panagitsa, Modi, Tithorea and Aghia Marina settlements. They are mainly of the palmette and pedimental type or simply raw stones. One is of the Boeotian beam-like type and another has been reworked on the occasion of a secondary use, so that a triangular tip is created. Finally, one stele bears a relief decoration. The pieces are dated from the 6th to the 2nd century BC, and the style of the first two categories indicates the existence of local or regional workshops. The inscribed names are
common in Phocis, Boeotia and Lokris, while some rare or even unknown ones enrich the record of the ancient cities they belonged to (Elateia, Triteis or Pedieis, Tithorea, Ledon or Patronis).
Tabula Imperii Romani, as the name indicates, begun as a map. This was one of the first attempts to visualise a database in geographic terms. However, due to the vast amount of archaeological date, Tabula was converted to a gazetteer. Maps became a mere supplement to this index. With the GIS mapping and online databases (in the future), maps have regained importance in the TIR project.
The Academy of Athens participates in the TIR project since 1972. The first volume (Philippi) was published in 1993 and covers part of the eastern Macedonia and the Greek part of Thrace. Over the last decade an effort has been made to publish the entire area of Greece. Four new volumes are now available (Aegean Islands, Epirus, Central Greece from Pagasetic Gulf to Ionian Sea, Attica), two in press (Boiotia, Thessaly) and one is under preparation (Macedonia).
The research group and authors of TIR volumes in the Academy of Athens are currently exploring new ways for presenting and analysing the data of the published books. The first example of this process is Western Greece (Aitolia-Akarnania and Epirus) in the forthcoming conference. With a series of interactive density maps, we will present the changes in the settlement pattern and we will try to give answers to historical issues like the impact of the Roman presence in the area. This case study can serve as a model for the rest of Greece.
Georgios Zachos – Vyron Antoniadis